The Five Presidents’ Report of 2015 called for a macroeconomic stabiliser that would be capable of dealing with asymmetric shocks. A European unemployment benefits scheme (EUBS) is one potential stabilisation mechanism, although other proposals for devising risk-sharing tools that could be deployed across the eurozone have also been put forward over the years. The following papers, based on a recent Intereconomics conference, explore and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various schemes entertained. Which one holds the greatest promise of reducing the risk of deep recession? Do such schemes inevitably lead to moral hazard or are there practical safeguards that can be built into their provisions to minimise this risk? Are any of these proposals politically feasible in the near term? This Forum seeks to answer these questions, searching for solutions that can overcome the political resistance to risk sharing in order to secure the economic benefits of risk reduction.

  • Reflections on the Euro Area Fiscal Stance

    Jacopo Cimadomo, European Central Bank
    Sebastian Hauptmeier, European Central Bank
    Christophe Kamps, European Central Bank
    Nadine Leiner-Killinger, European Central Bank

    Read PDF

  • Fiscal Rules and the Scope for Risk Sharing

    Iain Begg, London School of Economics and Political Science

    Read PDF

  • The Stabilising Role of US Federal Fiscal Institutions – What Lessons for the Euro Area?

    Cinzia Alcidi, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)
    Gilles Thirion, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)

    Read PDF

  • What the EU Can Learn from the American Experience with Unemployment Insurance

    Suzanne Simonetta, US Department of Labor

    Read PDF

  • European Fiscal Governance and Cyclical Stabilisation: Searching for a Lasting Arrangement

    Nicolas Carnot, European Commission

    Read PDF

  • Risk Reduction, Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard: A Vaccination Metaphor

    Frank Vandenbroucke, University of Amsterdam

    Read PDF

  • Ten Lessons from a Decade of Debating an EUBS: Robust Findings, Popular Myths and Remaining Dilemmas

    Sebastian Dullien, Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK)

    Read PDF


DOI: 10.1007/s10272-017-0659-6